Learn, hack!

Hacking and security documentation: slides, papers, video and audio recordings. All in high-quality, daily updated, avoiding security crap documents. Spreading hacking knowledge, for free, enjoy. Follow on .

ExploitSpotting: Locating Vulnerabilities Out Of Vendor Patches Automatically

Type
Slides
Tags
bug hunting, exploiting, reverse engineering
Authors
Jeongwook Oh
Event
Black Hat USA 2010
Indexed on
Mar 27, 2013
URL
https://media.blackhat.com/bh-us-10/presentations/Jeongwook_Oh/BlackHat-USA-2010-Jeongwook-Oh-ExploitSpotting-Locating-Vulnerabilities-Out-Of-Vendor-Patches-Automatically-slides.pdf
File name
BlackHat-USA-2010-Jeongwook-Oh-ExploitSpotting-Locating-Vulnerabilities-Out-Of-Vendor-Patches-Automatically-slides.pdf
File size
1.3 MB
MD5
b99b45ba113e3a614d002e10f1cae4cd
SHA1
4a62f6ba7bc455a79e2aef88b2b08002bd1df4b3

We already have many kinds of binary patching systems available. There are commercial ones and free ones. But the current implementations only concentrate on finding the difference between binaries. But what the security researchers really want from the patch analysis is security patches. Sometimes it's very hard to locate security patches because they are buried inside normal feature updates. The time for locating the security patches will increase drastically as more feature updates are included in the released patches. This is especially true with all the Adobe and Sun product patches. They tend to mix security patches and feature updates. In that case, we need another way to boost the speed of the analysis. The automatic way to locate the security patches! This can be done by analyzing the patched parts and see if it has some specific patterns that the usual security patches have. Some integer overflow will have some comparison against the boundary integer values. And buffer overflow will involve the vulnerable "strcpy" or "memcpy" replaced with safer functions. Even free-after-use type bug has their own patch patterns. We will present all the common patterns that we saw and also present way to locate them using pattern matching. But there can be more thing to be done in addition to this simple approach. You can introduce static taint analysis to binary diffing world. You can trace back all the suspicious variables(expressed as register value or memory location) found in the patch by using binary diffing. And you can see if they are controllable or taint-able from the user controllable input like network packets or user supplied file input. This automatic security patch locating ability will be beneficial to the IPS rule writers. They can spend more time in concentrating on what really matters instead of spending time to find the actual parts to analyze. To achieve all these, I upgraded the current implementation of "DarunGrim(http://www.darungrim.org)" binary diffing system to support pattern matching and static taint analysis. It will become DarunGrim v3. DarunGrim is the most featured opensource binary diffing implementation. I will show how fast we can locate the vendor patches that, otherwise, will take few hours using other tools. All the updated source code will be released at the presentation.

About us

Secdocs is a project aimed to index high-quality IT security and hacking documents. These are fetched from multiple data sources: events, conferences and generally from interwebs.

Statistics

Serving 8166 documents and 531.0 GB of hacking knowledge, indexed from 2419 authors from 163 security conferences.

Contribute

To support this site and keep it alive, you can click on the buttons below. Any help is really appreciated! This service is provided for free, but real money is needed to pay bills.

Flattr this Click here to lend your support to: Keep live SecDocs for an year and make a donation at www.pledgie.com !